May 17, 2012   Opinion   8 Comments

Commentary: Democratic Anarchy

Or also: Coordinated Anarchy

The “anarchist” type has been so twisted throughout the media that some people truly do not trust it. This makes me wonder.

Not because some people have misunderstood what anarchy is, but that some people do not realise they participate in it more and more.

People will generally “fall in line” to follow the original order, but when things do not go their way they will demand a change of scene. When this is multiple persons doing so, it becomes democracy.

When the change of scene involves going against an “order,” it becomes anarchy. Generally, the people want “freedom” to express. How to achieve this is by generating chaos in order to make order, otherwise the attempt may fall silent.

Witnessed at the Keyser council meetings, the citizens have generated chaotic order against the order in-order for their voices to be heard. Refusing to be suppressed, the citizens worked together as a democracy to get what they want. If it included speaking out, that is what they did – remember, the citizens employee these officials.

It continues further as the water rates are going haywire.

More people are advocating their right to express, and go against this scene due to it evidently be malformed.

The citizens are even going as far as to oust particular parts of the local government. No, I’m not saying they’re attempting to disassemble the government, but it’s obvious they’re attempting to get it back on track.

What channels these outbursts more is that it appears the administration is selectively hearing people. While one person is called to be out-of-order, another is able to speak freely. The citizens see this and label it foul play – Never getting the last word.

Then you have other people portraying the citizens that are demanding progression and correction to be the evil type. While some of them may have bad intentions, it is clear that they are doing what they can do for their voices to be heard.

If things were fair, it would not be this way.

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF
,



  • Resq2808

    So, you are saying that public outbursts whenever your friends feel like it is OK? But yet your very own site of EOK does not allow dissenting opinion or they are ridiculed, bullied and even threatened. So why are these people not allowed to speak but you are whenever you feel like it at a public meeting.

    • str8gov

      Ty Clifford is not the admin nor has been of the Eye on Keyser! I think your information crossed, somewhere

      • Resq2808

        Ty Clifford is very tight with the EOK group. I know he is not the admin, which is Ralph Broadwater & Vanessa Broadwater on Water St.

        • EyeR

          If you are aware he(Ty Clifford) is not the owner, Why refer to it as ‘your very own site’ ?

          Even if he does know these people, Even very well, Why does responsibility of what another does – Or fails to do – fall upon said shoulders?

          Have you leant thought to the possibility that the ‘dissenting opinion’ is ridiculed because it is deserving of ridicule? with the ‘bullying’ and ‘threatening’ being natural evolution of the frustration of (futile) attempts to make a retard see sense?

          I’ve no clue what I’m talking about, here – But I can already see your arguments are weighted with logic and seasoned with wisdom.

          Thats Sarcasm, btw, It’s more than just a seven letter word…

          • Resq2808

            WOW you used mighty big words there. Seems odd Ralph, you must have had someone write that for you. Maybe it was your good buddy Sterling AKA Mr. Bartlett.
            So bullying and threatening is ok if that is the only way to make a retard understand. Good to know. Now maybe I will reappear on EOK just bully and bash all of you for spreading false rumors and innuendo against people. Since that is all that you morons understand.

          • EyeR

            I’ve gotta say, your personal reality is mighty interesting. From the standpoint that it has no viable connection to any feasible commonly shared reality. I’m sure there’s a word for that….

            I digress… You fire orf three names there, none of which I feel the inclination to investigate, certainly don’t know or of them. Personally, I abhor the concept of bullying and wielding weight over leverages to the disadvantage of other, unless its you – you waived such rights by engaging in a game that you don’t even know how to play. And can’t even indentify either the identity or the roles of the players. Such traits essentially make you a severe liability. Not for teh damages you could intentionally cause, you’re far too stupid for that – Its the things you could do without thinking. I never said bullying is ‘ok’ – I simply said its likely an observable factor that gradually changed in incriments over time – or evolved, Something mentally you are incapable of – And cited probable cause. I also mentioned I have no prior knowledge of the events you speak – but I’m sure If I google: inurl:EOK “poorly constructed Whiney faggorty” I’ll be able to find your posts if needed. Again, you mention another site, which as far as I can tell its only real affiliation is they’re both focused loosely on a similar topic. Does this mean you’ll soon complaint to google that duckduck isn’t stealing enough of your data? or emailing the chromium project to tell them firefox won’t display your panda porn properly – Or ringing apple to tell them that using your m$ OS is sapping your general ability to think coherently? Although it’d be sad to see such a wonderful source of entertainment leave, What makes you think if anyone is bothered – Here or there – if you ‘reappear’ on EOK to ‘bully’ and ‘bash’ them (which considering your ability to construct a coherent argument – or even have a relevancy to even yourself – Should be amusing to document for future publication)

            If the rumors are false, Time will pertain the ultimate proof. Weighted evidence is truly the key. You only provide this to your detriment, and you can’t even see it.

            Innuendo is just that, innuendo – It happens all the time, both to the advantages and detriment – Time too will reveal the truth in this, again, weighted argument is teh key.

            You have no key, You haven’t lost it, you never had it to start with. I’d say you’ve lost the plot, but you never had that to start with, either.

            Good luck ‘bullying’ and ‘bashing’ me on EOK – I’ve never been there. I am thinking about going there to look for you, though – Did no-one ever tell you? Don’t feed teh trolls – Tho, here or there – Don’t you think you should be swimming more towards shallow waters?

            Some people really shouldn’t be allowed to play in the gene pool.

            Even at teh shallow end.

          • Resq2808

            All I can say is learn to use spell check. Correct your spelling come up with a valid argument and form a coherent thought and come back to see me.

            You can go back with your idiots on EOK and talk about me all you want, try and figure out who I am, maybe discuss it at breakfast at the Royal when you are there with the rest of the mob.

          • EyeR

            Lol.
            I couldn’t care less who you is, Thats as insignificant as as you lecturing myself on having a valid arguments whilst you’re so far disconnected from actuality you could no longer find your arse armed with GPS. I’ll ‘correct’ my spelling, when you correct your inability to think, and assimilate basic information. I find spelling based comments most amusing, too – ’cause really, owtta tha two o us, I’m bar far teh one with both the rights to wield and abuse this language. I can assure you of this. I also take further amusement at your implication that I own idiots on EOK – I don’t own idiots, I jus attract people like you like the gravity of a small sun attracts insignificant refuse. Another similarity is they are both consumed in the process. What part of ‘I’ve never been on EOK’ causes you difficulty in understanding? The only reason I know what it is, is because you’ve provided more than enough clues. (I’ve tried to provide you more than a few of my own. Such a shame your houseplant IQ can’t seem to grasp them.) So, really, I can’t go back anywhere. You can tho – there’s a vacant space under w/e rock you crawled from, I’m sure. I would suggest you fill it again, as every step down this path you take will only prove you more stupid